FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R5 M435

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R5 M435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R5 M435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V4800

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
26% HIGHER MSRP
$189 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R5 M435

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M435 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (860 vs 854), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M435 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $39 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $189, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 26.9% (5.7 vs 4.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M435 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V4800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R5 M435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V4800

The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R5 M435

The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon R5 M435 reaches 860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M435). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435).

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	Radeon R5 M435
G3D Mark Score	854	860
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+150%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS+67%	0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+100%	20
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	Radeon R5 M435
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M435 carries 512 MB. FirePro 3D V4800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M435. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) — the FirePro 3D V4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	Radeon R5 M435
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R5 M435's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro 3D V4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M435). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	Radeon R5 M435
TDP	74W-1%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.5	11.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the Radeon R5 M435 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M435 was 20.6% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) — the Radeon R5 M435 offers 26.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M435 (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	Radeon R5 M435
MSRP	$189	$150-21%
Performance per Dollar	4.5	5.7+27%
Codename	Juniper	Jet
Release	April 26 2010	May 15 2016
Ranking	#780	#922

Search FirePro 3D V4800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M435 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.