FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon 520

FirePro 3D V4800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 520

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon 520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V4800

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 142.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $189 MSRPvs$78 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $78 MSRP).
  • 48% higher power demand at 74W vs 50W.

Radeon 520

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $111 less on MSRP ($78 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
  • Delivers 148% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 74W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (874 vs 854), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $111 cheaper on MSRP at $78 vs $189, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148% (11.2 vs 4.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V4800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V4800

The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 520 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 512 (Radeon 520). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon 520
G3D Mark Score
854
874+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+56%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon 520
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 carries 512 MB. FirePro 3D V4800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and 64-bit on the Radeon 520.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon 520
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon 520
TDP
74W
50W-32%
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
11.5
17.5+52%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78. On MSRP, Radeon 520 was 58.7% cheaper ($111 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the Radeon 520 offers 148.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon 520
MSRP
$189
$78-59%
Performance per Dollar
4.5
11.2+149%
Codename
Juniper
Lexa
Release
April 26 2010
April 20 2017
Ranking
#780
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.