FirePro 3D V4800 vs HD Graphics 520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs HD Graphics 520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs HD Graphics 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V4800

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V4800 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
89% HIGHER MSRP
$189 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌393.3% higher power demand at 74W vs 15W.

HD Graphics 520

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 74W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

HD Graphics 520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (861 vs 854), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

HD Graphics 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $189, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 90.5% (8.6 vs 4.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V4800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V4800 vs HD Graphics 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V4800

The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520).

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	HD Graphics 520
G3D Mark Score	854	861
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Generation 9.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm+
Shading Units	800+317%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS+219%	0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+433%	3
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	HD Graphics 520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V4800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and System on the HD Graphics 520.

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	HD Graphics 520
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 132.6% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	HD Graphics 520
TDP	74W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.5	57.4+399%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 47.1% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 91.1% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 520 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro 3D V4800	HD Graphics 520
MSRP	$189	$100-47%
Performance per Dollar	4.5	8.6+91%
Codename	Juniper	Skylake GT2
Release	April 26 2010	September 1 2015
Ranking	#780	#929

Search FirePro 3D V4800 on Amazon

Search HD Graphics 520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.