
FirePro 3D V4800

Radeon R7 A10-8750
FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($189 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.5% higher power demand at 74W vs 55W.
Radeon R7 A10-8750
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 74W, a 19W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌32.3% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$189 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R7 A10-8750
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854 | 856 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+35% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 carries 512 MB. FirePro 3D V4800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 29.5% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 55W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 15.6+36% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V4800 was 24.4% cheaper ($61 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the FirePro 3D V4800 offers 32.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8750 (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189-24% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5+32% | 3.4 |
| Codename | Juniper | Cape Verde |
| Release | April 26 2010 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #780 | #667 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













