FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V4800 is positioned at rank 227 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is on rank 173, so the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V4800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V4800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $86 for the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600, it costs 77% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 338.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+338.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($86) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854+2% | 837 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 6144+668% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+5454% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 384+860% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 3 MB+3650% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 119.8% difference. The FirePro 3D V4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-75% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5+311% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119 and now averages $86. The FirePro 3D V4800 costs 76.7% less ($66 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.7 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 9.7 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the FirePro 3D V4800 offers 340.2% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189 | $119-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-77% | $86 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.7+340% | 9.7 |
| Codename | Juniper | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #780 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
