
FirePro W2100

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W2100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 50W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌7.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 851+2% | 832 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 768+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W2100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual carries 512 MB. FirePro W2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W2100 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W2100) vs 11.2 (FL 11_0) (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 (FL 11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W2100) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W2100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual's 50W — a 63.2% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 26W-48% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+97% | 16.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W2100 came in at $139, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro W2100 was 7.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro W2100) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) — the FirePro W2100 offers 10.9% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W2100 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-7% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+11% | 5.5 |
| Codename | Oland | — |
| Release | August 12 2014 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #910 | #881 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













