FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R5 M435

FirePro W2100

2014Core: 630 MHzBoost: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R5 M435 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R5 M435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W2100

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 26W instead of 75W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M435

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 7.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
  • 188.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 26W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M435 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (860 vs 851), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.8% (6.1 vs 5.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M435 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R5 M435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W2100

The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M435

The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the Radeon R5 M435 reaches 860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M435 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M435). Raw compute: 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435). Boost clocks: 680 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureFirePro W2100Radeon R5 M435
G3D Mark Score
851
860+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4352 TFLOPS
0.6592 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1030 MHz+51%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
20
20
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W2100Radeon R5 M435
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W2100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M435 carries 512 MB. FirePro W2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W2100 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M435. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W2100) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) — the FirePro W2100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W2100Radeon R5 M435
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the Radeon R5 M435's 75W — a 97% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M435). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W2100Radeon R5 M435
TDP
26W-65%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
32.7+184%
11.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W2100 came in at $139, while the Radeon R5 M435 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro W2100 was 7.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro W2100) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) — the FirePro W2100 offers 7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M435 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W2100Radeon R5 M435
MSRP
$139-7%
$150
Performance per Dollar
6.1+7%
5.7
Codename
Oland
Jet
Release
August 12 2014
May 15 2016
Ranking
#910
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.