
FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

FirePro W2100
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W2100 is positioned at rank 190 and the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is on rank 313, so the FirePro W2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W2100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W2100 and Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M reaches 853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Raw compute: 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Boost clocks: 680 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 851 | 853 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 640+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4352 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+128% |
| Boost Clock | 680 MHz | 775 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 40+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M has 512 MB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W2100) vs 12 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W2100) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M's 50W — a 63.2% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 26W-48% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+91% | 17.1 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W2100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Oland | Venus |
| Release | August 12 2014 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #910 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














