HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon HD 4830

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon HD 4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon HD 4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 520

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 4830

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4830 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
30% HIGHER MSRP
$130 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4830 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (866 vs 861), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4830 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

HD Graphics 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $130, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29.2% (8.6 vs 6.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4830 has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon HD 4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Radeon HD 4830

The Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon HD 4830 reaches 866 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon HD 4830 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm+ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4830). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4830).

Feature	HD Graphics 520	Radeon HD 4830
G3D Mark Score	861	866
Architecture	Generation 9.0	TeraScale
Process Node	14 nm+	55 nm
Shading Units	192	640+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.3456 TFLOPS	0.736 TFLOPS+113%
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	24	32+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	HD Graphics 520	Radeon HD 4830
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4830 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4830 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 520 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4830.

Feature	HD Graphics 520	Radeon HD 4830
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4830's 95W — a 145.5% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4830). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	HD Graphics 520	Radeon HD 4830
TDP	15W-84%	95W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	—	246mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	57.4+531%	9.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 520 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 4830 launched at $130. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 23.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 6.7 (Radeon HD 4830) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 28.4% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 520 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	HD Graphics 520	Radeon HD 4830
MSRP	$100-23%	$130
Performance per Dollar	8.6+28%	6.7
Codename	Skylake GT2	RV770
Release	September 1 2015	October 21 2008
Ranking	#929	#920

Search HD Graphics 520 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4830 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.