
GRID M10-0B

HD Graphics 520
GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-0B
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M10-0B is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3900% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
HD Graphics 520
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3854.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 871+1% | 861 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 640+233% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+384% | 0.3456 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+45% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 carries 0 MB. GRID M10-0B gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0B and System on the HD Graphics 520.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 57.4+1372% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-0B came in at $4000, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 97.5% cheaper ($3900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID M10-0B) vs 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 4200% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0B (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $100-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 8.6+4200% |
| Codename | GM107 | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #622 | #929 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














