GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520

GRID M10-0B

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
VS

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0B

2016

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M10-0B is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3900% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

HD Graphics 520

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3854.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-0B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (871 vs 861), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-0B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $4,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3854.1% (8.6 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0B vs HD Graphics 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-0B

The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-0BHD Graphics 520
G3D Mark Score
871+1%
861
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
640+233%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+384%
0.3456 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+45%
900 MHz
ROPs
16+433%
3
TMUs
40+67%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-0BHD Graphics 520
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 carries 0 MB. GRID M10-0B gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0B and System on the HD Graphics 520.

FeatureGRID M10-0BHD Graphics 520
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID M10-0BHD Graphics 520
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
3.9
57.4+1372%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0B came in at $4000, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 97.5% cheaper ($3900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID M10-0B) vs 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 4200% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0B (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M10-0BHD Graphics 520
MSRP
$4000
$100-98%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
8.6+4200%
Codename
GM107
Skylake GT2
Release
May 18 2016
September 1 2015
Ranking
#622
#929

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.