GRID M10-0B vs Radeon HD 4830

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0B vs Radeon HD 4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-0B vs Radeon HD 4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0B

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2976.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,000 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
❌136.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 95W.

Radeon HD 4830

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,870 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2959.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 225W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-0B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (871 vs 866), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-0B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4830 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,870 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $4,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2959.3% (6.7 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4830 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0B vs Radeon HD 4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0B

The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

Radeon HD 4830

The Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the Radeon HD 4830 reaches 866 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4830 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4830). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4830).

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon HD 4830
G3D Mark Score	871	866
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+127%	0.736 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon HD 4830
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4830 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4830 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0B and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4830. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4830) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon HD 4830
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4830's 95W — a 81.3% difference. The Radeon HD 4830 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon HD 4830
TDP	225W	95W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	246mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	3.9	9.1+133%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0B came in at $4000, while the Radeon HD 4830 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4830 was 96.8% cheaper ($3870 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID M10-0B) vs 6.7 (Radeon HD 4830) — the Radeon HD 4830 offers 3250% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0B (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GRID M10-0B	Radeon HD 4830
MSRP	$4000	$130-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	6.7+3250%
Codename	GM107	RV770
Release	May 18 2016	October 21 2008
Ranking	#622	#920

Search GRID M10-0B on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4830 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.