GRID M10-0B vs Radeon R7 G
GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0B is positioned at rank 403 and the Radeon R7 G is on rank 104, so the Radeon R7 G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 G.
| Insight | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 G holds the technical lead. Priced at $51 (vs $1,000), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1858.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1858.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($51) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0B and Radeon R7 G
GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Radeon R7 G
The Radeon R7 G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 870 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the Radeon R7 G reaches 870 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 G). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 G). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 871 | 870 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+34% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 G) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 G's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon R7 G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 350W (Radeon R7 G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 100W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 8.7+123% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the Radeon R7 G launched at $69 and now averages $51. The Radeon R7 G costs 94.9% less ($949 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) vs 17.1 (Radeon R7 G) — the Radeon R7 G offers 1800% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | Radeon R7 G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $69-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $51-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 17.1+1800% |
| Codename | GM107 | Trinidad |
| Release | May 18 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #622 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-0B and Radeon R7 G
