HD Graphics 520
VS
Radeon 520

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon 520

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 520

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon 520 is on rank 112, so the Radeon 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 520

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
647%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
622%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
614%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
613%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
612%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
609%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
601%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
599%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
593%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
592%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
584%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
583%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
573%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
572%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
88%
#97
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
714%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
100%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
99%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
98%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
97%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
94%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
92%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
92%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.

InsightHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $78), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 119.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+119.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($78)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and Radeon 520

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

AMD

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon 520 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 512 (Radeon 520). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
G3D Mark Score
861
874+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm+
14 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3456 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+250%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1183 MHz+31%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 has 512 MB. The Radeon 520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
250W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Perf/Watt
57.4+228%
17.5
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78 and now averages $78. The HD Graphics 520 costs 55.1% less ($43 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 119.6% better value. The Radeon 520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon 520
MSRP
$100
$78-22%
Avg Price (30d)
$35-55%
$78
Performance per Dollar
24.6+120%
11.2
Codename
Skylake GT2
Lexa
Release
September 1 2015
April 20 2017
Ranking
#929
#668