Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs FirePro 3D V3750
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is positioned at rank 554 and the FirePro 3D V3750 is on rank 307, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (1 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 565v holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 29.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 565v and FirePro 3D V3750
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points.
FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v scores 353 and the FirePro 3D V3750 reaches 341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro 3D V3750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 353+4% | 341 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+211% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3750 has 256 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v draws 50W versus the FirePro 3D V3750's 274W — a 138.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.1+492% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 565v launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 and now averages $25. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) — the Mobility Radeon HD 565v offers 29.4% better value. The FirePro 3D V3750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 565v | FirePro 3D V3750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-50% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+29% | 13.6 |
| Codename | Broadway | Tahiti |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #846 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 565v and FirePro 3D V3750
