Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4250

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4250

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is positioned at rank 643 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is on rank 694, so the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

#633
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5483%
#635
4971%
#636
4958%
#640
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4508%
#641
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4477%
#643
100%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
99%
#645
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#646
97%
#647
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
96%
#648
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#649
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
96%
#650
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#651
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#652
GeForce 9400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#653
GeForce 9600M GS
MSRP: $70|Avg: $20
94%
#654
Mobility Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#655
Mobility Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $45
94%
#656
GeForce 8800 GT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $25
93%
#657
GeForce 8400
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
91%
#658
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4250

#683
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
11079%
#685
10043%
#686
10016%
#690
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
9108%
#691
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
9046%
#693
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#694
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#695
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#696
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
98%
#697
GeForce 8600 GTS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $35
95%
#698
GeForce 8800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $50
95%
#699
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
93%
#700
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
93%
#701
GeForce 8600M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
91%
#702
GeForce 7650 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
91%
#703
Mobility Radeon X1400
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#704
GeForce 8600 GT
MSRP: $159|Avg: $15
90%
#705
GeForce 7900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
88%
#706
GeForce 6150SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
85%
#707
Mobility Radeon X1350
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
84%
#708
Mobility Radeon X1300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200.

InsightMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+48.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 and Mobility Radeon HD 4250

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 97 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 scores 97 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4250).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score
97
98+1%
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB+100%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4250's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
3.2+60%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.7 (Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200) vs 6.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) — the Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200 offers 49.2% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD serie 4200Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP
$49-51%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
9.7+49%
6.5
Codename
M98
Broadway
Release
January 9 2009
January 7 2010
Ranking
#927
#846