Mobility Radeon X1350 vs GeForce 6200
Mobility Radeon X1350
Popular choices:
GeForce 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is positioned at rank 708 and the GeForce 6200 is on rank 734, so the Mobility Radeon X1350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1350
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Mobility Radeon X1350, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 38.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1350 and GeForce 6200
Mobility Radeon X1350
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1350 scores 40 versus the GeForce 6200's 37 — the Mobility Radeon X1350 leads by 8.1%. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 6200 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 384 (GeForce 6200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40+8% | 37 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+40% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 144 KB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1350 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200 has 256 MB. The GeForce 6200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6200) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs No (GeForce 6200). Decoder: AVIVO vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | No |
| Decoder | AVIVO | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1350 draws 50W versus the GeForce 6200's 10W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 350W (GeForce 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 10W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 3.7+363% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1350 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6200 launched at $129 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6200 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 3.7 (GeForce 6200) — the GeForce 6200 offers 37% better value. The GeForce 6200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-62% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 3.7+37% |
| Codename | Broadway | GP108B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1350 and GeForce 6200
