
Mobility Radeon X1350

Quadro FX 350M
Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro FX 350M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon X1350
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 350M
2008Why buy it
- ✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1350
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1350 scores 40 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 12.5%. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 45+13% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1350 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M carries 256 MB. Quadro FX 350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1350 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: AVIVO vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | None |
| Decoder | AVIVO | PureVideo HD (VP1) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1350 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8+300% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X1350 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














