
GeForce Go 7200

Mobility Radeon X1350
GeForce Go 7200 vs Mobility Radeon X1350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7200 vs Mobility Radeon X1350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce Go 7200 vs Mobility Radeon X1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7200
2014Why buy it
- ✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌28% higher power demand at 64W vs 50W.
Mobility Radeon X1350
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 64W, a 14W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7200 vs Mobility Radeon X1350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7200
The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

Mobility Radeon X1350
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7200 scores 45 versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 40 — the GeForce Go 7200 leads by 12.5%. The GeForce Go 7200 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon X1350 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45+13% | 40 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7200 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1350 carries 128 MB. Mobility Radeon X1350 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7200 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1350.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.125 GB+98% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7200) vs AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350). Decoder: PureVideo vs AVIVO. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7200) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1350).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | AVIVO |
| Decoder | PureVideo | AVIVO |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7200 draws 64W versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 50W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.8+14% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7200 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | Broadway |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #777 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














