CPU
GPU
GeForce Go 7200
Popular choices:
Radeon X1050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce Go 7200 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The Radeon X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.9% higher G3D Mark score and 296.8% more VRAM (256 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7200.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1050 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7200 and Radeon X1050
GeForce Go 7200
The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.
Radeon X1050
The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7200 scores 45 versus the Radeon X1050's 49 — the Radeon X1050 leads by 8.9%. The GeForce Go 7200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7200) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45 | 49+9% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+1404% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1050 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7200) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.25 GB+297% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7200 draws 64W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 15.1% difference. The Radeon X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7200) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 55W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 165mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | Strix Halo |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #777 | #126 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7200 and Radeon X1050
