
GeForce Go 7200
Popular choices:

Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce Go 7200 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7200 and Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce Go 7200
The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7200 scores 45 and the Radeon Xpress 1250 reaches 43 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7200) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45+5% | 43 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1250 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7200) vs Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7200 draws 64W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 1.6% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7200) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-2% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7200 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | Oland |
| Release | May 29 2014 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #777 | #871 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












