CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon X1400
Popular choices:
Radeon X1050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is positioned at rank #704 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2009). The Radeon X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1400.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 14% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X1400.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1400 and Radeon X1050
Mobility Radeon X1400
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points.
Radeon X1050
The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1400 scores 43 versus the Radeon X1050's 49 — the Radeon X1050 leads by 14%. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 43 | 49+14% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+1203% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (9_3) (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1400 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-45% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+56% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1400 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon X1050 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 1.0 (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 offers 11.1% better value. The Radeon X1050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.0+11% |
| Codename | M98 | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #927 | #126 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1400 and Radeon X1050
