Mobility Radeon X1700 vs GeForce 9300 GS
Mobility Radeon X1700
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is positioned at rank #631 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300 GS.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon X1700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1700 and GeForce 9300 GS
Mobility Radeon X1700
The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
GeForce 9300 GS
The GeForce 9300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1700 scores 105 and the GeForce 9300 GS reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9300 GS uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 GS). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GS).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+55% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300 GS) — the GeForce 9300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300 GS). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3+65% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs No (GeForce 9300 GS). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9300 GS).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | No |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1700 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9300 GS's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 106mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 3.1+48% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1700 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9300 GS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 9300 GS costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs Infinity (GeForce 9300 GS) — the GeForce 9300 GS offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 9300 GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1700 | GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadway | GM108 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1700 and GeForce 9300 GS
