Mobility Radeon X1900 vs RADEON HD 6350
Mobility Radeon X1900
Popular choices:
RADEON HD 6350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is positioned at rank 599 and the RADEON HD 6350 is on rank 240, so the RADEON HD 6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1900
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD 6350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD 6350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1900.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 91.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1900 and RADEON HD 6350
Mobility Radeon X1900
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
RADEON HD 6350
The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1900 scores 135 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 135 | 141+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 320 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1900 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD 6350 has 512 MB. The RADEON HD 6350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2 (11_0)+24% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.4+120% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1900 draws 50W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 70-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+238% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1900 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30 and now averages $30. The Mobility Radeon X1900 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers 91.5% better value. The RADEON HD 6350 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $30-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+91% | 4.7 |
| Codename | Broadway | Cayman |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #846 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1900 and RADEON HD 6350
