Mobility Radeon X1900 vs GeForce 9650M GT
Mobility Radeon X1900
Popular choices:
GeForce 9650M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is positioned at rank 599 and the GeForce 9650M GT is on rank 679, so the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1900
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9650M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (1 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1900.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1900 and GeForce 9650M GT
Mobility Radeon X1900
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1900 scores 135 and the GeForce 9650M GT reaches 137 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9650M GT uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 640 (GeForce 9650M GT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 135 | 137+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 320 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1900 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB. The GeForce 9650M GT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0)+23% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3+65% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1900 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 75W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+50% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1900 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100 and now averages $25. The Mobility Radeon X1900 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 5.5 (GeForce 9650M GT) — the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers 63.6% better value. The GeForce 9650M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+64% | 5.5 |
| Codename | Broadway | GM107 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | October 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #671 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1900 and GeForce 9650M GT
