Mobility Radeon X1900 vs RADEON X800 SE
Mobility Radeon X1900
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is positioned at rank 599 and the RADEON X800 SE is on rank 719, so the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1900
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The RADEON X800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 SE.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.8% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 SE.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1900 and RADEON X800 SE
Mobility Radeon X1900
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
RADEON X800 SE
The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1900 scores 135 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 135+4% | 130 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+1226% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1900 draws 50W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+13% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1900 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X800 SE launched at $200 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Mobility Radeon X1900) vs 8.7 (RADEON X800 SE) — the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers 3.4% better value. The RADEON X800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1900 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-76% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+3% | 8.7 |
| Codename | Broadway | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #846 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1900 and RADEON X800 SE
