GeForce 210 vs Mobility Radeon X1900

NVIDIA

GeForce 210

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon X1900

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 210 vs Mobility Radeon X1900 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 210 vs Mobility Radeon X1900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 210

2019

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Mobility Radeon X1900 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Mobility Radeon X1900

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 210 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (138 vs 135), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.2% (2.8 vs 2.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 210 vs Mobility Radeon X1900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 210

The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1900

The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the Mobility Radeon X1900 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon X1900 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900).

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
G3D Mark Score
138+2%
135
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB+80%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1900 carries 256 MB. GeForce 210 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1900. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 210) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1900) — the GeForce 210 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the Mobility Radeon X1900's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
TDP
10W-80%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90°C
Perf/Watt
13.8+411%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 210 came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon X1900 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1900 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 210) vs 2.8 (Mobility Radeon X1900) — the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 210Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP
$50
$49-2%
Performance per Dollar
2.8
2.8
Codename
GP108B
Broadway
Release
February 20 2019
January 7 2010
Ranking
#643
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.