Mobility Radeon X2300 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Mobility Radeon X2300
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is positioned at rank #694 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X2300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 24675% higher G3D Mark score and 6300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X2300.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-24675%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+24675%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2377.5% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X2300.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2377.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X2300 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Mobility Radeon X2300
The Mobility Radeon X2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X2300 scores 48 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 24675%. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 48 | 11,892+24675% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+702% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 2.5 MB+3025% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X2300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 6300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 8 GB+6300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12.2+36% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: AVIVO vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | AVIVO | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2300 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 91.5+9050% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X2300 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Mobility Radeon X2300 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Mobility Radeon X2300) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2378.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-80% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 79.3+2378% |
| Codename | Broadway | GA106 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #846 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X2300 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
