Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Quadro FX 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon X2500
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 370
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌158% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 84+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X2500 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | — | PureVideo 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+300% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon X2500 came in at $50, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X2500 was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the Mobility Radeon X2500 offers 128.6% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X2500 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-61% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6+129% | 0.7 |
| Codename | Broadway | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















