Mobility Radeon X2500 vs RADEON X800 GT
Mobility Radeon X2500
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is positioned at rank 668 and the RADEON X800 GT is on rank 361, so the RADEON X800 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2500
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 GT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The RADEON X800 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X2500.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.4% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X2500.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X2500 and RADEON X800 GT
Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 and the RADEON X800 GT reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X800 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GT).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 84+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4608+476% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+1752% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 40 | 288+620% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 1 MB+1150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GT) — the RADEON X800 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the RADEON X800 GT's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+433% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X2500 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X800 GT launched at $249 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 5.6 (RADEON X800 GT) — the RADEON X800 GT offers 1.8% better value. The RADEON X800 GT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-80% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 5.6+2% |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X2500 and RADEON X800 GT
