Mobility Radeon X2500 vs RADEON X800 GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X2500 vs RADEON X800 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon X2500 vs RADEON X800 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X2500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 386.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X800 GT

2020

Why buy it

✅Mobility Radeon X2500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
398% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 GT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (84 vs 82), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon X2500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 386.1% (1.6 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon X2500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X800 GT has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon X2500 vs RADEON X800 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X2500

The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

RADEON X800 GT

The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 and the RADEON X800 GT reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X800 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GT).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X2500	RADEON X800 GT
G3D Mark Score	82	84+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	4608+476%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS+1752%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	40	288+620%
L1 Cache	0.08 MB	1 MB+1150%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon X2500	RADEON X800 GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X2500 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GT) — the RADEON X800 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X2500	RADEON X800 GT
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the RADEON X800 GT's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X2500	RADEON X800 GT
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.6+433%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X2500 came in at $50, while the RADEON X800 GT launched at $249. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X2500 was 79.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 0.3 (RADEON X800 GT) — the Mobility Radeon X2500 offers 433.3% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 GT (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X2500	RADEON X800 GT
MSRP	$50-80%	$249
Performance per Dollar	1.6+433%	0.3
Codename	Broadway	Navi 21
Release	January 7 2010	October 28 2020
Ranking	#846	#42

Search Mobility Radeon X2500 on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.