
Mobility Radeon X2500

Radeon HD 2350
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Radeon HD 2350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Radeon HD 2350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Radeon HD 2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon X2500
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 2350
2012Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X2500 vs Radeon HD 2350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Mobility Radeon X2500 leads by 6.5%. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82+6% | 77 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1792+124% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+156% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 448 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X2500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 120% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+300% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon X2500 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) — the Mobility Radeon X2500 offers 6.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2350 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6+7% | 1.5 |
| Codename | Broadway | Tahiti |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #846 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














