MOBILITY RADEON X300
VS
Radeon 9550 / X1050

MOBILITY RADEON X300 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X300

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is positioned at rank #716 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X300

#706
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
15966%
#708
14474%
#709
14435%
#713
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
13126%
#714
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
13037%
#716
MOBILITY RADEON X300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#717
MOBILITY RADEON X700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#718
Mobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#719
RADEON X800 SE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
96%
#720
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
81%
#721
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
75%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
66%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
62%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
60%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
59%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
56%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
54%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
53%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
50%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
49%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
49%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon 9550 / X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
Performance
Leading raw performance (+17.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-17.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon 9550 / X1050, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 474.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+474.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X300 and Radeon 9550 / X1050

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X300

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X300 scores 34 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 leads by 17.2%. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
G3D Mark Score
34+17%
29
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+56%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
1.247 TFLOPS+11%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has 512 MB. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
DirectX
9.0b
9_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 draws 50W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.7+17%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) vs 0.6 (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers 466.7% better value. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X300Radeon 9550 / X1050
MSRP
$50
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-80%
$49
Performance per Dollar
3.4+467%
0.6
Codename
Broadway
Lexa
Release
January 7 2010
March 27 2019
Ranking
#846
#772