MOBILITY RADEON X700 vs GeForce Go 6600
MOBILITY RADEON X700
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is positioned at rank 717 and the GeForce Go 6600 is on rank 280, so the GeForce Go 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X700 and GeForce Go 6600
MOBILITY RADEON X700
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 scores 67 and the GeForce Go 6600 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce Go 6600 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 960 (GeForce Go 6600). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 69+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 960+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+77% |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 6600's 140W — a 94.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-64% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+160% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 6600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | GK106 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #846 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON X700 and GeForce Go 6600
