MOBILITY RADEON X700 vs Radeon X1650 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is positioned at rank #717 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700

#707

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

16204%

#709

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

14690%

#710

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

14651%

#714

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

13322%

#715

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

13231%

#717

MOBILITY RADEON X700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#718

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

99%

#719

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

97%

#720

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

82%

#721

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

76%

#722

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

67%

#723

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

63%

#724

Radeon X1200

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

61%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

60%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

57%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

55%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

54%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

51%

#730

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

49%

#731

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

49%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1650 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon X1650 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1650 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 131.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+131.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 Benchmark Check

Radeon X1650 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X700 and Radeon X1650 SE

MOBILITY RADEON X700

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 scores 67 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 6%. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
G3D Mark Score	67	71+6%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	2560+220%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	160+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
DirectX	9.0b	9.0c
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X700	Radeon X1650 SE
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	1.3+333%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 offers 142.9% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).