MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs MOBILITY RADEON X700
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is positioned at rank 685 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 is on rank 717, so the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 79.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+79.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL and MOBILITY RADEON X700
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
MOBILITY RADEON X700
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL scores 60 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 67 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 leads by 11.7%. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is built on TeraScale while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 67+12% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.12 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 has 128 MB. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL draws 30W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 50% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+54% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers 76.5% better value. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0+76% | 3.4 |
| Codename | M98 | Broadway |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #818 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL and MOBILITY RADEON X700
