
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

RADEON X600 PRO
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (60 vs 67).
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X600 PRO
2020Why buy it
- ✅+11.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌102% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
- ❌16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL scores 60 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the RADEON X600 PRO leads by 11.7%. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is built on TeraScale while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 67+12% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.39 TFLOPS+626% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 128+220% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | — | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL draws 30W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+400% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL came in at $49, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers 71.4% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+71% | 0.7 |
| Codename | M98 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #818 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














