GeForce G 103M vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

NVIDIA

GeForce G 103M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G 103M vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 103M vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G 103M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5% in PassMark G3D (63 vs 60), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G 103M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G 103M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G 103M vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 5%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
G3D Mark Score
63+5%
60
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800 ×2+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+28%
0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
16
16 ×2
TMUs
24
40 ×2+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB
160 KB+11%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce G 103M) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce G 103M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G 103M) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
DirectX
10.0+11%
9_0b
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Encoder
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.1+5%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G 103M (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce G 103MMOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP
$49
Codename
GP108
M98
Release
May 17 2017
January 9 2009
Ranking
#641
#818

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.