CPU
GPU
GeForce G 103M
Popular choices:
Radeon X1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G 103M is positioned at rank 252 and the Radeon X1300 is on rank 345, so the GeForce G 103M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G 103M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G 103M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G 103M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G 103M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G 103M and Radeon X1300
GeForce G 103M
The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 8.6%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63+9% | 58 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+311% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1645 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G 103M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 has 256 MB. The GeForce G 103M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G 103M) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G 103M) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-70% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+250% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GP108 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #641 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G 103M and Radeon X1300
