
GeForce G 103M

RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G 103M
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X600 PRO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
RADEON X600 PRO
2020Why buy it
- ✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce G 103M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 103M
The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the RADEON X600 PRO leads by 6.3%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63 | 67+6% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+467% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1560 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X600 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G 103M) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+425% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce G 103M | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | GP108 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #641 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














