
GeForce 8400M GT

GeForce G 103M
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce G 103M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce G 103M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce G 103M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M GT
2014Why buy it
- ✅96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce G 103M
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce G 103M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M GT
The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

GeForce G 103M
The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 versus the GeForce G 103M's 63 — the GeForce 8400M GT leads by 6.3%. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G 103M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 384 (GeForce G 103M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67+6% | 63 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1468 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G 103M carries 512 MB. GeForce G 103M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce G 103M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400M GT) vs No (GeForce G 103M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce G 103M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (GeForce G 103M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce G 103M (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #854 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














