GeForce G 103M vs RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON 9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (58 vs 63).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G 103M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.6% in PassMark G3D (63 vs 58), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce G 103M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 8.6%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	63+9%	58
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1218%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	2900 MHz+98%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G 103M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 carries 128 MB. GeForce G 103M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON 9800
TDP	30W-45%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.1+91%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON 9800
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	GP108	Strix Halo
Release	May 17 2017	January 6 2025
Ranking	#641	#98

Search GeForce G 103M on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.