GeForce G 103M vs Radeon 2100

NVIDIA

GeForce G 103M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G 103M vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 103M vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 103M vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce G 103M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G 103M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5% in PassMark G3D (63 vs 60), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce G 103M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G 103M vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 5%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
G3D Mark Score
63+5%
60
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+43%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+43%
1024 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
144 KB+50%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce G 103M) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce G 103M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G 103M) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0b
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G 103M) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
Encoder
No
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.1+75%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce G 103MRadeon 2100
MSRP
$149
Codename
GP108
Polaris 24
Release
May 17 2017
May 13 2019
Ranking
#641
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.