GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X800 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X800 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X800 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

RADEON X800 PRO

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce G 103M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 PRO is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (65 vs 63), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 PRO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON X800 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G 103M scores 63 and the RADEON X800 PRO reaches 65 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON X800 PRO
G3D Mark Score	63	65+3%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	3840+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS+1335%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	2105 MHz+43%
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	24	240+900%
L1 Cache	144 KB	768 KB+433%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON X800 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G 103M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 PRO carries 256 MB. GeForce G 103M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON X800 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON X800 PRO
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.1+600%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X800 PRO (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	GP108	Navi 21
Release	May 17 2017	October 28 2020
Ranking	#641	#65

Search GeForce G 103M on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.