
GeForce Go 7400

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce Go 7400 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7400 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce Go 7400 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7400
2014Why buy it
- ✅+10% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (60 vs 66).
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7400 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7400
The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the GeForce Go 7400 leads by 10%. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 66+10% | 60 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2+15% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40 ×2+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7400 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL carries 512 MB. MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 30W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 2.0+100% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7400 (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | M98 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #777 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














