Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

2009Core: 550 MHz

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

  • +10% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (60 vs 66).
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 10% in PassMark G3D (66 vs 60), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 85.5% (1.2 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 leads by 10%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
G3D Mark Score
66+10%
60
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800
800 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+27%
0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
16
16 ×2
TMUs
40
40 ×2
L1 Cache
80 KB
160 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 50% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
1.3
2.0+54%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 came in at $100, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers 71.4% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 4225 (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP
$100
$49-51%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
1.2+71%
Codename
Broadway
M98
Release
January 7 2010
January 9 2009
Ranking
#846
#818

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.