Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce GTX 1060
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1060 is significantly newer (2016 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 1060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 300.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-300.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+300.5%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 65% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1034.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1034.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S80 and GeForce GTX 1060
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Moore Threads MTT S80 scores 2,513 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 300.5%. The Moore Threads MTT S80 is built on MUSA while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,513 | 10,064+300% |
| Architecture | MUSA | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+66% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 256+300% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+60% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S80 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S80 draws 255W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 34.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 180W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 400W-27% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 173mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 55.9+465% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 64.7% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1033.1% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $260 | $249-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $60-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 167.7+1033% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | GP104 |
| Release | sem dados | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #635 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S80 and GeForce GTX 1060
