Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GRID K240Q
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
GRID K240Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Per Dollar GRID K240Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID K240Q is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GRID K240Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K240Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K240Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 329.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+329.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S80 and GRID K240Q
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S80 scores 2,513 and the GRID K240Q reaches 2,541 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 is built on MUSA while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,513 | 2,541+1% |
| Architecture | MUSA | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+167% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+544% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 256+700% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | — |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S80 draws 255W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 12.5% difference. The GRID K240Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 225W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 11.3+14% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 MSRP and currently averages $170, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500 and now averages $40. The GRID K240Q costs 76.5% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 63.5 (GRID K240Q) — the GRID K240Q offers 329.1% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $260-48% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $40-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 63.5+329% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | GK104 |
| Release | sem dados | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #635 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S80 and GRID K240Q
