
Moore Threads MTT S80

Radeon HD 6950
Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon HD 6950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon HD 6950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon HD 6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Radeon HD 6950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S80 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌27.5% higher power demand at 255W vs 200W.
Radeon HD 6950
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 255W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$260 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon HD 6950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.

Radeon HD 6950
The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S80 scores 2,513 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 is built on MUSA while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,513 | 2,593+3% |
| Architecture | MUSA | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+191% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+555% | 2.253 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 256+700% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+191% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 carries 1 GB. Moore Threads MTT S80 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S80 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6950. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6950) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S80 draws 255W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 24.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 200W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 275mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 13.0+31% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S80 came in at $260, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S80 was 13% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) vs 8.7 (Radeon HD 6950) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 offers 11.5% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S80 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $260-13% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7+11% | 8.7 |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Cayman |
| Release | sem dados | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #635 | #623 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















