GRID M40
Moore Threads MTT S80
GRID M40 vs Moore Threads MTT S80 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M40 vs Moore Threads MTT S80 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID M40 vs Moore Threads MTT S80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 255W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌284.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$260 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $740 less on MSRP ($260 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅GRID M40 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S80 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌410% higher power demand at 255W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M40 vs Moore Threads MTT S80 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID M40
The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M40 scores 2,500 and the Moore Threads MTT S80 reaches 2,513 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M40 is built on Maxwell while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GRID M40) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GRID M40 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500 | 2,513 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | MUSA |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7933 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+1759% |
| ROPs | 16 | 256+1500% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M40 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M40 and 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S80. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M40) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M40 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M40 draws 50W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 134.4% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M40) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID M40 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 50.0+405% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M40 came in at $1000, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S80 was 74% cheaper ($740 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID M40) vs 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 offers 288% better value.
| Feature | GRID M40 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $260-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 9.7+288% |
| Codename | GM107 | Chunxiao |
| Release | May 18 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #742 | #635 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M40 and Moore Threads MTT S80
