GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GRID M40

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GRID M40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GRID M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 577.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.

GRID M40

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,525 vs 2,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 577.9% (16.9 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GRID M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID M40

The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the GRID M40 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GRID M40
G3D Mark Score	2,525+1%	2,500
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.425 TFLOPS+80%	0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	64 KB	192 KB+200%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M40 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GRID M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 64-bit on the GRID M40. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GRID M40
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 75% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GRID M40
TDP	110W	50W-55%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	23.0	50.0+117%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti came in at $149, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2.5 (GRID M40) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 576% better value. The newer card here is GRID M40 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GRID M40
MSRP	$149-85%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	16.9+576%	2.5
Codename	GK106	GM107
Release	October 9 2012	May 18 2016
Ranking	#633	#742

Search GeForce GTX 650 Ti on Amazon

Search GRID M40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.