GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 850M

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz

GeForce GTX 850M

2014Core: Up to 936 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

110

2,525

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 850M

2,537

+0.5%

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850M

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

97%

#58

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

214%

#60

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

194%

#61

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

193%

#65

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

176%

#66

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

175%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

95%

#82

Arc 7-Core iGPU

MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 850M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Insight	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 32.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+32.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 850M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 850M

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 850M

The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 and the GeForce GTX 850M reaches 2,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 850M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 850M). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
G3D Mark Score	2,525	2,537
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.425 TFLOPS+23%	1.155 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	320 KB+400%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 850M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
DirectX	11.0	11.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 850M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the GeForce GTX 850M's 45W — a 83.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 850M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti	GeForce GTX 850M
TDP	110W	45W-59%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	23.0	56.4+145%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 63.4 (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 32.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 850M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).